Michael’s article, State Amici, Collective Action, and the Development of Federalism Doctrine, 46 Ga. L. Rev. 355 (2012), is now in print.

Several of Michael’s publications were cited:

• Appellate Practice and Procedure: Cases and Materials (Thomson-West, 2d ed. 2005) (with Robert Martineau, Kent Sinclair & Randy Holland), in Laurie A. Lewis, Winning the Game of Appellate Musical Shoes: When the Appeals Band Plays, Jump from the Client’s to the Judge’s Shoes to Write the Statement of Facts Ballad, 46 Wake Forest L. Rev. 983 (2011);
• Congress, Separation of Powers, and Standing, 59 Case W. Res. L. Rev. 1023 (2009), in Bradford C. Mank, Informational Standing after Summers, 39 B.C. Envtl. Aff. L. Rev. 1 (2011);
• Deciding to Decide: Class Action Certification and Interlocutory Review by the United States Courts of Appeals under Rule 23(f) , 41 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 1531 (2000) (with Christine Oliver Hines), in Michael Dore, Law of Toxic Torts (Clark Boardman Callaghan Supp. 2012);
• Forum-Selection Clauses and the Privatization of Procedure, 25 Cornell Intl. L.J. 51 (1992), in James E. Pfander & David R. Pekarek Krohn, Interlocutory Review by Agreement of the Parties: A Preliminary Analysis, 105 Nw. U. L. Rev. 1043 (2011);
• The Next Word: Congressional Response to Supreme Court Statutory Decisions, 65 Temp. L. Rev. 425 (1992) (with James L. Walker), in Bertrall L. Ross, II, Against Constitutional Mainstreaming, 78 U. Chi. L. Rev. 1203 (2011);
• The Quiet Revolution in Personal Jurisdiction, 73 Tul. L. Rev. 1 (1998), in Katherine Florey, State Law, U.S. Power, Foreign Disputes: Understanding the Extraterritorial Effects of State Law in the Wake of Morrison v. National Australia, 92 B.U. L. Rev. 535 (2012); and Rebecca C. Griffin, Student Author, Finding Access to the Federal Courts: How the Inconsistent Application of Federal Jurisdiction in Cases with Significant Foreign Relations Implications Affects Mining and Agricultural Industries, 4 Ky. J. Equine, Agric. & Nat. Resources L. 213 (2011-2012);
• Revitalizing Interlocutory Appeals in the Federal Courts, 58 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1165 (1990), in James E. Pfander & David R. Pekarek Krohn, Interlocutory Review by Agreement of the Parties: A Preliminary Analysis, 105 Nw. U. L. Rev. 1043 (2011);
• State Amici, Collective Action, and the Development of Federalism Doctrine, 46 Ga. L. Rev. 355 (2012), in Caroline Cecot, Blowing Hot Air: An Analysis of State Involvement in Greenhouse Gas Litigation, 65 Vand. L. Rev. 189 (2012);
• Status Seeking and the Allure and Limits of Law School Rankings, 81 Ind. L.J. 299 (2006), in Paula Lustbander, Painting beyond the Numbers: The Art of Providing Inclusive Law School Admission to Ensure Full Participation in the Profession, 40 Cap. U. L. Rev. 71 (2012); and
• Supreme Court Monitoring of the United States Courts of Appeals En Banc, 9 S. Ct. Econ. Rev. 171 (2001) (with Tracey George), in Stephen L. Wasby, Why Sit En Banc? 63 Hastings L.J. 747 (2012); and Ryan J. Owens & David A. Simon, Explaining the Supreme Court’s Shrinking Docket, 53 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 1219 (2012).

Michael was quoted in Carrie Whitaker, Occupy Cincinnati Holds Press Conference, Cincinnati Enquirer (Mar. 13, 2012).