Brad’s article, Is Prudential Standing Jurisdictional?, was accepted for publication and will appear in volume 64 of the Case Western Reserve Law Review (forthcoming 2013-2014).

Several of Brad’s articles were cited:

• Can Plaintiffs Use Multinational Environmental Treaties as Customary International Law to Sue Under the Alien Tort Statute?, 2007 Utah L. Rev. 1085 (2007), in Lauren McCaskill, When Oil Attacks: Litigation Options for Nigerian Plaintiffs in U.S. Federal Courts, 22 Health Matrix 535 (2013);
• Environmental Justice and Discriminatory Siting: Risk-Based Representation and Equitable Compensation, 56 Ohio St. L.J. 329 (1995), in Mike Ewall, Legal Tools for Environmental Equity vs. Environmental Justice, 13 Sustainable Dev. L. & Pol’y 4 (2013);
• Environmental Justice and Title VI: Making Recipient Agencies Justify Their Siting Decisions, 73 Tul. L. Rev. 787 (1999), in Mike Ewall, Legal Tools for Environmental Equity vs. Environmental Justice, 13 Sustainable Dev. L. & Pol’y 4 (2013);
•  Implementing Rapanos — Will Justice Kennedy’s Significant Nexus Test Provide a Workable Standard for Lower Courts, Regulators, and Developers?, 40 Ind. L. Rev. 291 (2007), in Stephen M. Durden, Textualisms, 2 Brit. J. Am. Legal Stud. 59 (2013);
• Standing in Monsanto Co. v. Geertson Seed Farms: Using Economic Injury as a Basis for Standing when Environmental Harm is Difficult to Prove, 115 Penn. St. L. Rev. 307 (2010), in Kelly E. Calder, Student Author, Harvesting a Lawsuit: Challenging the Enforcement and Validity of Monsanto’s Transgenic Seed Patents, 5 Ky. J. Equine, Agric. & Nat. Resources L. 97 (2013); and
• Textualism’s Selective Canons of Statutory Construction: Reinvigorating Individual Liberties, Legislative Authority, and Deference to Executive Agencies, 86 Ky. L.J. 527 (1998), in Stephen M. Durden, Textualisms, 2 Brit. J. Am. Legal Stud. 59 (2013).