A prolific and well-known scholar of administrative and environmental law, many of Brad’s publications were cited:

• After Gonzales v. Raich: Is the Endangered Species Act Constitutional Under the Commerce Clause?, 78 U. Colo. L. Rev. 375 (2007), in Pamela Vesilind, Preempting Humanity: Why National Meat Ass’n V. Harris Answered the Wrong Question, 65 Me. L. Rev. 685 (2013); in  Dan A. Akenhead, Federal Regulation of Noncommercial, Intrastate Species Under the ESA After Alabama-Tombigbee Rivers Coalition v. Kempthorne and Stewart & Jasper Orchards Et Al. v. Salazar, 53 Nat. Resources J. 325 (2013); and in Janet E. Milne, The U.S. Supreme Court Opens a Door: Expanded Opportunities for Environmental Taxes, 43 Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis 10406 (2013); 
• Are Title VI’s Disparate Impact Regulations Valid?, 71 U. Cin. L. Rev. 517, 532 (2002), in Kamina Aliya Pinder, Reconciling Race-Neutral Strategies and Race-Conscious Objectives: The Potential Resurgence of the Structural Injunction in Education Litigation, 9 Stan. J. Civ. Rts. & Civ. Liberties 247 (2013);
• Can Congress Regulate Intrastate Endangered Species Under the Commerce Clause? The Split in the Circuits Over Whether the Regulated Activity Is Private Commercial Development or the Taking of Protected Species, 69 Brook. L. Rev. 923, 989-90 (2004), in Dan A. Akenhead, Federal Regulation of Noncommercial, Intrastate Species Under the ESA After Alabama-Tombigbee Rivers Coalition v. Kempthorne and Stewart & Jasper Orchards Et Al. v. Salazar, 53 Nat. Resources J. 325 (2013);
• Informational Standing After Summers, 39 B.C. Envtl. Aff. L. Rev. 1 (2012), in Jonathan Remy Nash, Standing’s Expected Value, 111 Mich. L. Rev. 1283 (2013); 
• Is a Textualist Approach to Statutory Interpretation Pro-Environmentalist?: Why Pragmatic Agency Decisionmaking is Better Than Judicial Literalism, 53 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 1231, 1277-78 (1996), in Sandra Zellmer, Treading Water While Congress Ignores the Nation’s Environment, 88 Notre Dame L. Rev. 2323 (2013); 
• Protecting Intrastate Threatened Species: Does the Endangered Species Act Encroach on Traditional State Authority and Exceed the Outer Limits of the Commerce Clause?, 36 Ga. L. Rev. 723 (2002), in Doug Williams, A HARDER “HARD CASE”, 57 St. Louis U. L.J. 931 (2013); 
• Should States Have Greater Standing Rights than Ordinary Citizens?: Massachusetts v. EPA’s New Standing Test for States, 49 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 1701 (2008), in Charles Riordan, Barring the Gates: Timing and Tailoring Environmental Standing and Greenhouse Gas Regulation After Corri v. EPA, 40 B.C. Envtl. Aff. L. Rev. 567 (2013), and in Jonathan Remy Nash, Standing’s Expected Value, 111 Mich. L. Rev. 1283 (2013); 
• Standing and Statistical Persons: A Risk-Based Approach to Standing, 36 Ecology L.Q. 665 (2009), in Miles L. Galbraith, Student Author, Identity Crisis: Seeking a Unified Approach to Plaintiff Standing for Data Security Breaches of Sensitive Personal Information, 62 Am. U. L. Rev. 1365 (2013); in  Meaghan Millan, Student Author, The Justiciability of State Consumer Protection Claims in Federal Courts: A Study of Named Plaintiffs Who Cease Using the Disputed Product Yet Seek Injunctive Relief, 81 Fordham L. Rev. 3565 (2013); and in Jonathan Remy Nash, Standing’s Expected Value, 111 Mich. L. Rev. 1283 (2013);
• Summers v. Earth Island Institute: Its Implications for Future Standing Decisions, 40 Envtl. L. Rep. 10958 (2010), in Meaghan Millan, Student Author, The Justiciability of State Consumer Protection Claims in Federal Courts: A Study of Named Plaintiffs Who Cease Using the Disputed Product Yet Seek Injunctive Relief, 81 Fordham L. Rev. 3565 (2013);
• Superfund Contractors and Agency Capture, 2 N.Y.U. Envtl. L.J. 34, 49-52 (1993), in Sandra Zellmer, Treading Water While Congress Ignores the Nation’s Environment, 88 Notre Dame L. Rev. 2323 (2013); and
• The Split in the Circuits Over Whether the Regulated Activity Is Private Commercial Development or the Taking of Protected Species, 69 Brook. L. Rev. 923 2003-2004), in Janet E. Milne, The U.S. Supreme Court Opens a Door: Expanded Opportunities for Environmental Taxes, 43 Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis 10406 (2013).