Michael presented his paper, “The Fall and Rise of Specialized Federal Constitutional Courts” at a faculty workshop at the University of Dayton School of Law on September 11.

Several of his articles were cited.

• State Judicial Elections and the Limits of Calibrating Access to the Federal Courts, 96 Va. L. Rev. in Brief 41 (2010), in Martha F. Davis, Shadow and Substance: The Impact of the Anti-International Law Debate on State Courts, 47 New Eng. L. Rev. 631 (2013);
• State Amici, Collective Action, and the Development of Federalism Doctrine, 46 Ga. L. Rev. 355 (2012), in Brendan S. Maher & Radha A. Pathrak, Enough About the Constitution: How States Can Regulate health Insurance Under the ACA, 31 Yale L. & Pol’y Rev. 275 (2013);
• Congress, Ex parte Young, and the Fate of the Three-Judge District Court, 70 U. Pitt. L. Rev. 101 (2008), in Howard M. Wasserman, Understanding Civil Rights Litigation (LexisNexis 2013);
• The Future of Parity, 46 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 1457 (2005), in Howard M. Wasserman, Understanding Civil Rights Litigation (LexisNexis 2013);;
• The Next Word: Congressional Response to Supreme Court Statutory Decisions, 65 Temp. L. Rev. 425 (1992)(with James L. Walker), in Frank B. Cross, The New Legal Realism and Statutory Interpretation, 1 Theory & Practice of Legis. 129 (2013); and
• Judicial Influence: A Citation Analysis of Federal Courts of Appeals Judges, 27 J. Legal Stud. 271 (1998)(with William M. Landes & Lawrence Lessig), in John R. Lott, Dumbing Down the Courts: How Politics Keeps the Smartest Judges Off the Bench (Bascom Hill Publishing Group 2013).