Two of Brad’s most recent articles are now in print:
- Clapper v. Amnesty International: Two or Three Competing Philosophies of Standing Law?, 81 Tennessee Law Review 211 (2014), and
- Is Prudential Standing Jurisdictional?, 64 Case Western Reserve Law Review 413 (2013).
On April 10, Brad gave a presentation, titled Administrative Law Overview, to the Immigration Section of the Cincinnati Bar Association.
Several of Brad’s articles were cited:
- Informational Standing After Summers, 39 B.C. Envtl. Aff. L. Rev. 1 (2012), in Nadia Aksentijevich, An American Icon in Limbo: How Clarifying the Standing Doctrine Could Free Wild Horses and Empower Advocates, 41 B.C. Envtl. Aff. L. Rev. 399 (2014);
- Can Congress Regulate Interstate Endangered Species Under the Commerce Clause?, 69 Brook. L. Rev. 923 (2004), in Blair M. Warner, Overhauling ESA Private Land Provisions in Light of the Renewable Energy Boom on Federal Public Lands, 89 Notre Dame L. Rev. 175 (2014);
- Environmental Justice and Discriminatory Siting: Risk-Based Representation and Equitable Compensation, 56 Ohio St. L.J. 329 (1995), in Sean J. Wright, Good Fences Make Good Neighbors: An Environmental Justice Framework to Protect Prohibition Beyond Reservation Borders, 79 Brook. L. Rev. 1197 (2014);
- Is a Textualist Approach to Statutory Interpretation Pro-Environmentalist?: Why Pragmatic Agency Decision Making is Better than Judicial Literalism, 53 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 1231 (1996), in Zachary J. Gubler, Experimental Rules, 55 B.C. L. Rev. 129 (2014);
- Reading the Standing Tea Leaves in American Electric Power Co. v. Connecticut, 46 U. Rich. L. Rev. 543 (2012), in Lynn D. Lu, Standing in the Shadow of Tax Execptionalism: Expanding Access to Judicial Review of Federal Agency Rules, 66 Admin. L. Rev. 73 (2014);
- Standing and Statistical Persons: A Risk-Based Approach to Standing, 36 Ecology L.Q. 665 (2009), in Chung-Lin Chen , Institutional Roles of Political Processes, Expert Governance, and Judicial Review in Environmental Impact Assessment: A Theoretical Framework and a Case Study of Taiwan, 54 Nat. Resources J. 41 (2014); and
- The Environmental Protection Agency’s Project XL and Other Regulatory Reform Initiatives: The Need for Legislative Authorization, 25 Ecology L.Q. 1 (1998), in Hannah J. Wiseman, Remedying Regulatory Diseconomies of Scale, 94 B.U. L. Rev. 235 (2014).