Brad published:

• No Article III Standing for Private Plaintiffs Challenging State Greenhouse Gas Regulations: The Ninth Circuit’s Decision in Washington Environmental Council v. Bellon, 63 Am. U. L. Rev. 1525 (2014).

 
His article, Standing to View Other People’s Land: The D.C. Circuit’s Divided Decision in Sierra Club v. Jewell, will be published in Volume 40 of the Columbia Journal of Environmental Law (forthcoming 2015). His article, Prudential Standing Doctrine Abolished or Waiting for a Comeback?: Lexmark International, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc., will be published in Volume 18 of the University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law (forthcoming 2015–2016).

Several of Brad’s articles were cited:

• Rewarding Defendant Cooperation Under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines: Judges vs. Prosecutors, 26 Crim. L. Bull. 399 (1990), in Shaakirrah R. Sanders, Unbranding Confrontation as Only a Trial Right, 65 Hastings L.J. 1257 (2014).
• The Two-Headed Dragon of Siting and Cleaning Up Hazardous Waste Dumps: Can Economic Incentives or Mediation Slay the Monster?, 19 B.C. Envtl. Aff. L. Rev. 239 (1991), in David B. Spence, The Political Economy of Local Vetoes, 93 Tex. L. Rev. 351 (2014).
• The Environmental Protection Agency’s Project XL and Other Regulatory Reform Initiatives: The Need for Legislative Authorization, 25 Ecology L.Q. 1 (1998), in Daniel J. Fiorino, Streams of Environmental Innovation: Four Decades of EPA Policy Reform, 44 Envtl. L. 723 (2014).
• Textualism’s Selective Canons of Statutory Construction: Reinvigorating Individual Liberties, Legislative Authority, and Deference to Executive Agencies, 86 Ky. L.J. 527 (1998), in Anna Kim, Comment, FAA v. Cooper: How the Court Stripped the Privacy Act of its Purpose and Meaning, 46 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. 739 (2013); Margaret H. Lemos, Book Review, The Politics of Statutory Interpretation, 89 Notre Dame L. Rev. 849 (2013); Sarah L. Shilvock, Case Note, Smith v. Landfair, 39 Ohio N.U. L. Rev. 1103 (2013).
• Environmental Justice and Title VI: Making Recipient Agencies Justify Their Siting Decisions, 73 Tul. L. Rev. 787 (1999), in Tony LoPresti, Realizing the Promise of Environmental Civil Rights: The Renewed Effort to Enforce Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 65 Admin. L. Rev. 757 (2013).
• Proving an Environmental Justice Case: Determining an Appropriate Comparison Population, 20 Va. Envtl. L.J. 365 (2001), in Jonathan J. Smith, Banning the Box But Keeping the Discrimination?: Disparate Impact and Employers’ Overreliance on Criminal Background Checks, 49 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 197 (2014).
• Using § 1983 to Enforce Title VI’s Section 602 Regulations, 49 U. Kan. L. Rev. 321 (2001), in Ming Hsu Chen, Governing By Guidance: Civil Rights Agencies and the Emergence of Language Rights, 49 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 291 (2014).
• Protecting Intrastate Threatened Species: Does the Endangered Species Act Encroach on Traditional State Authority and Exceed the Outer Limits of the Commerce Clause?, 36 Ga. L. Rev. 723 (2002), in Blake Hudson, Dynamic Forest Federalism, 71 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 1643 (2014).
• The Murky Future of the Clean Water Act After SWANCC: Using a Hydrological Connection Approach to Saving the Clean Water Act, 30 Ecology L.Q. 811 (2003), in Blake Hudson, Dynamic Forest Federalism, 71 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 1643 (2014).
• Can Administrative Regulations Interpret Rights Enforceable Under Section 1983?: Why Chevron Deference Survives Sandoval and Gonzaga, 32 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. 843 (2005), in Lauren Tauro, Note, No Country for Old Men?: The Non-Preclusive Effect of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act on § 1983 Age Discrimination Claims, 88 St. John’s L. Rev. 255 (2014).
• Standing and Global Warming: Is Injury to All Injury to None?, 35 Envtl. L. 1 (2005), in Paul Boudreaux, Carrots and Sticks, from President Obama’s Solyndra and Beyond, 4 Wash. & Lee J. Energy, Climate, & Env’t 1 (2013).
• Civil Remedies, in Global Climate Change and U.S. Law 183 (Michael B. Gerrard ed., 2007), in Laura Westra, The Conflict Between Development and the Right of the Child to Health, 42 Denv. J. Int’l L. & Pol’y 1 (2013).
• Implementing Rapanos—Will Justice Kennedy’s Significant Nexus Test Provide A Workable Standard for Lower Courts, Regulators, and Developers?, 40 Ind. L. Rev. 291 (2007), in Karl S. Coplan, Citizen Litigants Citizen Regulators: Four Cases Where Citizen Suits Drove Development of Clean Water Law, 25 Colo. Nat. Resources, Energy & Envtl. L. Rev. 61 (2014).
• Title VI and the Warren County Protests, 1 Golden Gate U. Envtl. L.J. 73 (2007), in Tony LoPresti, Realizing the Promise of Environmental Civil Rights: The Renewed Effort to Enforce Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 65 Admin. L. Rev. 757 (2013).
• Should States Have Greater Standing Rights Than Ordinary Citizens?: Massachusetts v. EPA’s New Standing Test for States, 49 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 1701 (2008), in Kaitlin Ainsworth Caruso, Associational Standing for Cities,  47 Conn. L. Rev. 59 (2014); Seth Davis, Implied Public Rights of Action, 114 Colum. L. Rev. 1 (2014); Corey Moffat, Student Author, Establishing Causation in Private Party Climate Change Suits: Correcting the Mistakes of Washington Environmental Council v. Bellon, 44 Envtl. L. 959 (2014); Ann Woolhandler, Governmental Sovereignty Actions, 23 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 209 (2014); Heather Elliott, Federalism Standing, 65 Ala. L. Rev. 435 (2013).
• Standing and Future Generations: Does Massachusetts v. EPA Open Standing for Generations to Come?, 34 Colum. J. Envtl. L. 1 (2009), in Albert K. Butzel, Storm King Revisited: A View from the Mountaintop, 31 Pace Envtl. L. Rev. 370 (2014); Chung-Lin Chen, Institutional Roles of Political Processes, Expert Governance, and Judicial Review in Environmental Impact Assessment: A Theoretical Framework and a Case Study of Taiwan, 54 Nat. Resources J. 41 (2014); Corey Moffat, Student Author, Establishing Causation in Private Party Climate Change Suits: Correcting the Mistakes of Washington Environmental Council v. Bellon, 44 Envtl. L. 959 (2014).
• Standing and Statistical Persons: A Risk-Based Approach to Standing, 36 Ecology L.Q. 665 (2009), in Richard H. Fallon, Jr., How to Make Sense of Supreme Court Standing Cases—A Plea for the Right Kind of Realism, 23 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 105 (2014); James Ton-that, Student Author, Standing Up for the Little Guy: Proposing a Doctrinal Framework to Assess Standing for Patient Plaintiffs in the Context of Myriad and Diagnostic Genetic Testing, 23 Fed. Cir. Bar J. 647 (2014).
• Judge Posner’s “Practical” Theory of Standing: Closer to Justice Breyer’s Approach to Standing than to Justice Scalia’s, 50 Hous. L. Rev. 71 (2012), in Standing—Civil Procedure—Lexmark International, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc., 128 Harv. L. Rev. 321 (2014).
• Reading the Standing Tea Leaves in American Electric Power Co. v. Connecticut, 46 U. Rich. L. Rev. 543 (2012), in Lynn D. Lu, Standing in the Shadow of Tax Exceptionalism: Expanding Access to Judicial Review of Federal Agency Rules, 66 Admin. L. Rev. 73 (2014).
• Standing for Private Parties in Global Warming Cases: Traceable Standing Causation Does Not Require Proximate Causation, 2012 Mich. St. L. Rev. 869 (2012), in Corey Moffat, Student Author, Establishing Causation in Private Party Climate Change Suits: Correcting the Mistakes of Washington Environmental Council v. Bellon, 44 Envtl. L. 959 (2014).
• Is Prudential Standing Jurisdictional?, 64 Case W. Res. L. Rev. 413 (2013), in S. Todd Brown, The Story of Prudential Standing, 42 Hastings Const. L.Q. 95 (2014).
• Clapper v. Amnesty International: Two or Three Competing Philosophies of Standing Law?, 81 Tenn. L. Rev. 211 (2014), in Amanda Mariam McDowell, Note, The Impact of Clapper v. Amnesty International USA on the Doctrine of Fear-Based Standing, 49 Ga. L. Rev. 247 (2014).
• No Article III Standing for Private Plaintiffs Challenging State Greenhouse Gas Regulations: The Ninth Circuit’s Decision in Washington Environmental Council v. Bellon, 63 Am. U. L. Rev. 1525 (2014), in Corey Moffat, Student Author, Establishing Causation in Private Party Climate Change Suits: Correcting the Mistakes of Washington Environmental Council v. Bellon, 44 Envtl. L. 959 (2014).