Several of Brad’s articles were cited:
- Is a Textualist Approach to Statutory Interpretation Pro-Environmentalist?: Why Pragmatic Agency Decisionmaking Is Better than Judicial Literalism, 53 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 1231 (1996), in William W. Buzbee, Anti-Regulatory Skewing and Political Choice in UARG, 39 Harv. Envtl. L. Rev. 63 (2015).
- Textualism’s Selective Canons of Statutory Construction: Reinvigorating Individual Liberties, Legislative Authority, and Deference to Executive Agencies, 86 Ky. L.J. 527 (1998), in Caroline E. Keen, Student Author, Clarifying What is “Clear”: Reconsidering Whistleblower Protections Under Dodd-Frank, 19 N.C. Banking Inst. 215 (2015).
- Should State Corporate Law Define Successor Liability?: The Demise of CERCLA’s Federal Common Law, 68 U. Cin. L. Rev. 1157 (2000), in Taylor J. Phillips, The Federal Common Law of Successor Liability and the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, 6 Wm. & Mary Bus. L. Rev. 89 (2015).
- Standing and Global Warming: Is Injury to All Injury to None?, 35 Envtl. L. 1 (2005), in Adam Shinar, Enabling Resistance: How Courts Facilitate Departures From the Law, and Why This May Not Be a Bad Thing, 17 N.Y.U. J. Legis. & Pub. Pol’y 989 (2014).
- Can Plaintiffs Use Multinational Environmental Treaties As Customary International Law to Sue Under the Alien Tort Statute?, 2007 UTAH L. REV. 1085, in Gerlinde Berger-Walliser & Paul Shrivastava, Beyond Compliance: Sustainable Development, Business, and Proactive Law, 46 Geo. J. Int’l L. 417 (2015).
- Should States Have Greater Standing Rights Than Ordinary Citizens?: Massachusetts v. EPA’s New Standing Test for States, 49 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 1701 (2008), in Richard H. Fallon, Jr., The Fragmentation of Standing, 93 Tex. L. Rev. 1061 (2015).
- Standing and Statistical Persons: A Risk-Based Approach to Standing, 36 Ecology L.Q. 665 (2009), in Richard H. Fallon, Jr., The Fragmentation of Standing, 93 Tex. L. Rev. 1061 (2015); Patrick Gallagher, Environmental Law, Clapper v. Amnesty International, USA and the Vagaries of Injury-in-Fact: “Certainly Impending” Harm, “Reasonable Concern,” and “Geographic Nexus”, 32 UCLA J. Envtl. L. & Pol’y 1 (2014).
- Revisiting the Lyons Den: Summers v. Earth Island Institute’s Misuse of Lyons’s “Realistic Threat” of Harm Standing Test, 42 Ariz. St. L.J. 837 (2010), in Patrick Gallagher, Environmental Law, Clapper v. Amnesty International, USA and the Vagaries of Injury-in-Fact: “Certainly Impending” Harm, “Reasonable Concern,” and “Geographic Nexus”, 32 UCLA J. Envtl. L. & Pol’y 1 (2014).
- Judge Posner’s “Practical” Theory of Standing: Closer to Justice Breyer’s Approach to Standing than to Justice Scalia’s, 50 Hous. L. Rev. 71 (2012), in Joëlle Anne Moreno, Rights, Remedies, and the Quantum and Burden of Proof, 3 Va. J. Crim. L. 89 (2015).