Brad’s most recent article, Standing for Private Parties in Global Warming Cases: Traceable Standing Causation Does Not Require Proximate Causation, has been accepted for publication and is forthcoming in the Michigian State Law Review.

Brad’s article, Judge Posner’s “Practical” Theory of Standing, 50 Hous. L. Rev. 71 (2012), is now in print.

Several of Brad’s published articles were cited:

• After Gonzales v. Raich: Is the Endangered Species Act Constitutional Under the Commerce Clause?, 78 U. Colo. L. Rev. 375 (2007), in Robin Kundis Craig, Federalism Challenges to Cercla: An Overview, 41 Sw. L. Rev. 617 (2012);
• Can Congress Regulate Intrastate Endangered Species Under the Commerce Clause? The Split in the Circuits Over Whether the Regulated Activity Is Private Commercial Development or the Taking of Protected Species, 69 Brook. L. Rev. 923, 989-90 (2004), in Blake Hudson, Federal Constitutions: The Keystone of Nested Commons Governance, 63 Ala. L. Rev. 1007 (2012);
• The Draft Title VI Recipient and Revised Investigation Guidances: Too Much Discretion for EPA and a More Difficult Standard for Complainants?, 30 Envtl. L. Rep. 11144 (2000), in Nicholas C. Christiansen, Student Author, Environmental Justice: Deciphering the Maze of a Private Right of Action, 81 Miss. L.J. 843 (2012);
• Environmental Justice and Discriminatory Siting: Risk-Based Representation and Equitable Compensation, 56 Ohio St. L.J. 329 (1995), Jeannette De Guire, Student Author, The Cincinnati Environmental Justice Ordinance: Proposing a New Model for Environmental Justice Regulations by the States, 60 Clev. St. L. Rev. 223 (2012);
• Executive Order 12,898, chapter in The Law of Environmental Justice: Theories and Procedures to Address Disproportionate Risks (Michael B. Gerrard & Sheila R. Foster eds., 2008), in David W. Case, The Role of Information in Environmental Justice, 81 Miss. L.J. 701 (2012); in Nicholas C. Christiansen, Student Author, Environmental Justice: Deciphering the Maze of a Private Right of Action, 81 Miss. L.J. 843 (2012); and in Alex Geisinger, The Benefits of Development and Environmental Injustice, 37 Colum. J. Envtl. L. 205 (2012);
• Is There a Private Cause of Action Under EPA’s Title VI Regulations? The Need to Empower Environmental Justice Plaintiffs, 24 Colum. J. Envtl. L. 1 (1999), in Alex Geisinger, The Benefits of Development and Environmental Injustice, 37 Colum. J. Envtl. L. 205 (2012);
• Informational Standing After Summers, 39 B.C. Envtl. Aff. L. Rev. 1 (2012);
• Protecting Intrastate Threatened Species: Does the Endangered Species Act Encroach on Traditional State Authority and Exceed the Outer Limits of the Commerce Clause?, 36 Ga. L. Rev. 723 (2002), in Robin Kundis Craig, Federalism Challenges to Cercla: An Overview, 41 Sw. L. Rev. 617 (2012);
• Should States Have Greater Standing Rights than Ordinary Citizens?: Massachusetts v. EPA’s New Standing Test for States, 49 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 1701 (2008), in Devin McDougall, Student Author, Reconciling Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife and Massachusetts v. EPA on the Set of Procedural Rights Eligible for Relaxed Article III Standing, 37 Colum. J. Envtl. L. 151 (2012);
• Standing and Future Generations: Does Massachusetts v. EPA Open Standing for Generations to Come?, 34 Colum. J. Envtl. L. 1 (2009), in Devin McDougall, Student Author, Reconciling Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife and Massachusetts v. EPA on the Set of Procedural Rights Eligible for Relaxed Article III Standing, 37 Colum. J. Envtl. L. 151 (2012);
• Summers v. Earth Island Institute: Its Implications for Future Standing Decisions, 40 Envtl. L. Rep. 10958 (2010), in Devin McDougall, Student Author, Reconciling Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife and Massachusetts v. EPA on the Set of Procedural Rights Eligible for Relaxed Article III Standing, 37 Colum. J. Envtl. L. 151 (2012);
• Title VI, chapter in The Law of Environmental Justice: Theories and Procedures to Address Disproportionate Risks (Michael B. Gerrard & Sheila R. Foster eds., 2008), in April Hendricks Killcreas, Student Author, The Power of Community Action: Environmental Injustice and Participatory Democracy in Mississippi, 81 Miss. L.J. 769 (2012); in Nicholas C. Christiansen, Student Author, Environmental Justice: Deciphering the Maze of a Private Right of Action, 81 Miss. L.J. 843 (2012); and in Alex Geisinger, The Benefits of Development and Environmental Injustice, 37 Colum. J. Envtl. L. 205 (2012); and
• What Comes After Technology: Using an “Exceptions Process” to Improve Residual Risk Regulation of Hazardous Air Pollutants, 13 Stan. Envtl. L.J. 263 (1994), in Daniel A. Farber, Pollution Markets and Social Equity: Analyzing the Fairness of Cap and Trade, 39 Ecology L.Q. 1 (2012).