Doug’s article When Forensic Examiners Disagree: Bias, or Just Inaccuracy?, 18 Psychol. Pub. Policy L. (forthcoming 2012) was accepted for publication.
Doug attended the American Psychiatric Association annual meeting in Philadelphia (May 5-9), where (along with colleague Drew Barzman, M.D.) he presented Brief Rating of Aggression by Children and Adolescents (BRACHA): A Reliability Study on May 8.
Several of Doug’s articles were cited:
- Analyzing the Performance of Risk Assessment Instruments: A Response to Vrieze and Grove (2007), 32 L. & Hum. Behav. 279 (2008), in Frank Ezzo & Kevin Young, Child Maltreatment Risk Inventory: Pilot Data for the Cleveland Child Abuse Potential Scale, 27 J. Fam. Violence 145 (2012);
- Assessing Predictions of Violence – Being Accurate about Accuracy, 62 J. Consulting & Clin. Psychol. 783 (1994), in Chi Meng Chu et al., Violence Risk and Gang Affiliation in Youth Offenders: A Recidivism Study, 18 Psychol. Crime & L. 299 (2012); in John Monahan, The Individual Risk Assessment of Terrorism, 18 Psychol. Pub. Policy & L. 167 (2012); in Suzanne Yang & Edward P. Mulvey, Violence Risk: Re-Defining Variables from the First-Person Perspective, 17 Aggression & Violent Behav. 198 (2012); and in X. Yao et al., The Application of a Violence Risk Assessment Tool among Chinese Psychiatric Service Users: A Preliminary Study, 19 J. Psych. & Mental Health Nursing 438 (2012);
- The Imperfection of Protection through Detection and Intervention: Lessons from Three Decades of Research on the Psychiatric Assessment of Violence Risk, 30 J. Legal Med. 109 (2009), in Suzanne Yang & Edward P. Mulvey, Violence Risk: Re-Defining Variables from the First-Person Perspective, 17 Aggression & Violent Behav. 198 (2012);
- Quantifying the Accuracy of Forensic Examiners in the Absence of a “Gold Standard,” 34 L. & Hum. Behav. 102 (2010) (with Michael D. Bowen, David J. Vanness, David Bienenfeld, Terry Correll, Jerald Kay, William M. Klykylo, and Douglas S. Lehrer), in W. Neil Gowensmith et al., Field Reliability of Competence to Stand Trial Opinions: How Often Do Evaluators Agree, and What Do Judges Decide When Evaluators Disagree? 36 L. & Hum. Behav. 130 (2012); and
- ROC Curves and the Binormal Assumption, 3 J. Neuropsych. & Clin. Neurosci. 436 (1991) (with Eugene Somoza), in Betty S. Tsai et al., Audiometric Asymmetry and Tinnitus Laterality, 122 Laryngoscope 1148 (May 2012).