Three of Michael’s articles were cited in the November 2012 issue of the Harvard Law Review, which annually publishes articles critiquing the previous Term of the U.S. Supreme Court. The articles citing his work are:
- Pamela S. Karlan, The Supreme Court-2011 Term, Foreword: Democracy and Disdain, 126 Harv. L. Rev. 1 (2012), citing Institutional Process, Agenda Setting, and the Development of Election Law on the Supreme Court, 68 Ohio St.L.J. 767 (2007); The Supreme Court and the DIG: An Empirical and Institutional Analysis, 2005 Wis. L. Rev. 1421 (with Rafael Gely), and
- Case Note, 126 Harv. L. Rev. 337 (2012), citing Constitutional Litigation in Federal and State Courts: An Empirical Analysis of Judicial Parity, 10 Hastings Const. L.Q. 213 (1983)(with James Walker).
Several of his other articles were also cited.
- The Next Word: Congressional Response to Supreme Court Statutory Decisions, 65 Temp. L. Rev. 425 (1992) (with James Walker), in Diane P. Wood, When to Hold, When to Fold, and When to Reshuffle: The Art of Decisionmaking on a Multi-Member Court, 100 Cal. L. Rev. 1445 (2012);
- The Quiet Revolution in Personal Jurisdiction, 73 Tul. L. Rev. 1 (1998), in Dustin E. Buehler, Jurisdictional Incentives, 20 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 105 (2012), and Zach Vosseler, Case Note, A Throwback to Less Enlightened Practices: J. McIntyre Machinery, Ltd. v. Nicastro, 160 U. Pa. L. Rev. PENNumbra 366 (2012);
- An Economic and Empirical Analysis of Choice of Law, 24 Ga. L. Rev. 49 (1989), in Dustin E. Buehler, Jurisdictional Incentives, 20 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 105 (2012);
- Skills Skepticism in the Postclinic World, 40 J. Legal Educ. 307 (1990) (with Joseph Tomain), in Leary David, Competence as Situationally Appropriate Conduct: An Overarching Concept for Lawyering, Leadership, and Professionalism, 52 Santa Clare L. Rev. 725 (2012);
- Rethinking Feminist Judging, 70 Ind. L.J. 891 (1995) (with Susan Wheatley), in Andreia de Castro-Rodrigues & Ana Sacau, Letting the Field Show us the Way-A Mixed Methodology to Understand Judicial Decision Making, 2(5) Int’l J. App. Psy. 92 (2012); and
- Constitutional Litigation in Federal and State Courts: An Empirical Analysis of Judicial Parity, 10 Hastings Const. L.Q. 213 (1983), in Leading Cases, 126 Harv. L. Rev. 337 (2012).