Several of Brad’s articles were cited:
- After Gonzales v. Raich: Is the Endangered Species Act Constitutional Under the Commerce Clause?, in Kevin Simpson, Student Author, The Proper Meaning of “Proper”: Why the Regulation of Intrastate, Non-Commercial Species Under the Endangered Species Act Is an Invalid Exercise of the Commerce Clause, 91 Wash. U. L. Rev. 169 (2013);
- Protecting Intrastate Threatened Species: Does the Endangered Species Act Encroach on Traditional State Authority and Exceed the Outer Limits of the Commerce Clause?, in Kevin Simpson, Student Author, The Proper Meaning of “Proper”: Why the Regulation of Intrastate, Non-Commercial Species Under the Endangered Species Act Is an Invalid Exercise of the Commerce Clause, 91 Wash. U. L. Rev. 169 (2013);
- Reforming State Brownfield Programs to Comply with Title VI, 24 Harv. Envtl. L. Rev. 115 (2000), in Jenny J. Tang, Public Participation in Brownfield Redevelopment: A Framework for Community Empowerment in Zoning Practices, 3 Seattle J. Envtl. L. 241 (2013);
- Revisiting the Lyons Den: Summers v. Earth Island Institute’s Misuse of Lyons’s “Realistic Threat” of Harm Standing Test, 42 Ariz. St. L.J. 837 (2010), in Patrick Gallagher, Environmental Law, Clapper v. Amnesty International, USA and The Vagaries Of Injury-In-Fact: “Certainly Impending” Harm, “Reasonable Concern,” and ““Geographic Nexus”, 32 UCLA J. Envtl. L. & Pol’y 1 (2014); and
- Standing and Future Generations: Does Massachusetts v. EPA Open Standing for Generations to Come?, 34 Colum. J. Envtl. L. 1 (2009), in Kylie Wha Kyung Wager, In Common Law We Trust: How Hawai‘I’s Public Trust Doctrine Can Support Atmospheric Trust Litigation to Address Climate Change, 20 Hastings W.-N.W. J. Envtl. L. & Pol’y 55 (2014), and in Patrick Gallagher, Environmental Law, Clapper v. Amnesty International, USA and The Vagaries Of Injury-In-Fact: “Certainly Impending” Harm, “Reasonable Concern,” and ““Geographic Nexus”, 32 UCLA J. Envtl. L. & Pol’y 1 (2014).