Several of Barbara’s publications were cited:

• Behavioral Economics and Investor Protection: Reasonable Investors, Efficient Markets, 44 Loy. U. Chi. L.J. 1493 (2013), in Joseph A. Grundfest, Damages and Reliance Under Section 10(B) of the Exchange Act, 69 Bus. Law. 307 (2014);
• Can Behavioral Economics Inform Our Understanding of Securities Arbitration?, 12 Tenn. J. Bus. L. 107 (2010), in Teresa J. Verges, Opening the Floodgates of Small Customer Claims in FINRA Arbitration: FINRA v. Charles Schwab & Co., Inc., 15 Cardozo J. Conflict Resol. 623 (2014);
• Eliminating Securities Fraud Class Actions Under the Radar, 2009 Colum. Bus. L. Rev. 802 (2009), in Steven A. Ramirez, The Virtues of Private Securities Litigation: An Historic and Macroeconomic Perspective, 45 Loy. U. Chi. L.J. 669 (2014); and in Jonathan D. Glater, Hurdles of Different Heights for Securities Fraud Litigants of Different Types, 2014 Colum. Bus. L. Rev. 47 (2014);
• Establishing A Securities Arbitration Clinic: The Experience at Pace, 50 J. Legal Educ. 35 (2000), in Jill Gross, The Improbable Birth and Conceivable Death of the Securities Arbitration Clinic, 15 Cardozo J. Conflict Resol. 597 (2014); and in Teresa J. Verges, Opening the Floodgates of Small Customer Claims in FINRA Arbitration: FINRA v. Charles Schwab & Co., Inc., 15 Cardozo J. Conflict Resol. 623 (2014);
• Investor Protection Meets the Federal Arbitration Act, 1 Stan. J. Complex Litig. 1 (2012), in Teresa J. Verges, Opening the Floodgates of Small Customer Claims in FINRA Arbitration: FINRA v. Charles Schwab & Co., Inc., 15 Cardozo J. Conflict Resol. 623 (2014);
• Is Securities Arbitration Fair to Investors?, 25 Pace L. Rev. 1 (2004), in Teresa J. Verges, Opening the Floodgates of Small Customer Claims in FINRA Arbitration: FINRA v. Charles Schwab & Co., Inc., 15 Cardozo J. Conflict Resol. 623 (2014);
• Making It Up as They Go Along: The Role of Law in Securities Arbitration, 23 Cardozo L. Rev. 991 (2002), in Jill Gross, The Improbable Birth and Conceivable Death of the Securities Arbitration Clinic, 15 Cardozo J. Conflict Resol. 597 (2014);
• Should the SEC Be a Collection Agency for Defrauded Investors?, 63 Bus. Law. 317 (2008), in S.E.C. v. Teo, — F.3d —-, 2014 WL 503455 (3d Cir. Feb. 10, 2014);
• Stoneridge Investment Partners v. Scientific-Atlanta, Inc.: Reliance on Deceptive Conduct and the Future of Securities Fraud Class Actions, 36 Sec. Reg. L.J. 330 (2008), in Marc I. Steinberg, Pleading Securities Fraud Claims—Only Part of the Story, 45 Loy. U. Chi. L.J. 603 (2014);
• The Irony of Securities Arbitration Today: Why Do Brokerage Firms Need Judicial Protection?, 72 U. Cin. L. Rev. 415, 433 (2003), in Teresa J. Verges, Opening the Floodgates of Small Customer Claims in FINRA Arbitration: FINRA v. Charles Schwab & Co., Inc., 15 Cardozo J. Conflict Resol. 623 (2014);
• The SEC and the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act: Fighting Global Corruption Is Not Part of the SEC’s Mission, 73 Ohio St. L.J. 1093 (2012), in Christopher M. F. Smith, Student Author, Back on the (Supply) Chain Gang: Whether the SEC Final Rule for Supply Chain Disclosure Is the Beginning of Purely Social and Environmental Disclosure, 15 Vt. J. Envtl. L. 418 (2014); and
• When Perception Changes Reality: An Empirical Study of Investors’ Views of the Fairness of Securities Arbitration, 2008 J. Disp. Resol. 349 (2008), in Jill Gross, The Improbable Birth and Conceivable Death of the Securities Arbitration Clinic, 15 Cardozo J. Conflict Resol. 597 (2014); and in Teresa J. Verges, Opening the Floodgates of Small Customer Claims in FINRA Arbitration: FINRA v. Charles Schwab & Co., Inc., 15 Cardozo J. Conflict Resol. 623 (2014).