Solimine, Michael E. / Jan. & Feb. 2015

Michael’s article, Revitalizing Interlocutory Appeals in the Federal Courts, 58 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1158 (1990), was cited by a unanimous United States Supreme Court in its decision in Gelboim v. Bank of America Corp., 135 S. Ct. 897, 906 (2015).

Several of Michael’s books and articles were cited:

  • Newsmagazine Coverage of the Supreme Court, 57 Journalism Q. 661 (1980), in Todd A. Collins & Christopher A. Cooper, Making the Cases “Real”: Newspaper Coverage of U.S. Supreme Court Cases 1953–2004, 32 Pol. Comm. 23 (2015); and Jonathan Peters, Institutionalizing Press Relations at the Supreme Court: The Origins of the Public Information Office, 79 Mo. L. Rev. 985 (2014).
  • Shoring Up Article III: Legislative Court Doctrine in the Post CFTC v. Schor Era, 68 B.U. L. Rev. 85 (1988) (with Richard B. Saphire), in Jamie Dodge, Reconceptualizing Non-Article III Tribunals, 99 Minn. L. Rev. 905 (2015), and Michael P. Goodman, Taking Back Takings Claims: Why Congress Giving Just Compensation Jurisdiction to the Federal Court of Claims is Unconstitutional, 60 Vill. L. Rev. 83 (2015).
  • An Economic and Empirical Analysis of Choice of Law, 24 Ga. L. Rev. 49 (1989), in Lea Brilmayer, et al., Conflict of Laws: Cases and Materials (Aspen, 7th ed. 2015); and Gary J. Simson, Issues and Perspectives in Conflict of Laws: Cases and Materials (Carolina Academic Press, 5th ed. 2015).
  • Skills Skepticism in the Postclinic World, 40 J. Legal Ed. 307 (1990) (with Joseph P. Tomain), in Robert J. Condin, “Practice Ready Graduates”: A Millennialist Fantasy, 31 Touro L. Rev. 75 (2014).
  • Forum-Selection Clauses and the Privatization of Procedure, 25 Cornell Int’l L.J. 51 (1992), in Lea Brilmayer, et al., Conflict of Laws: Cases and Materials (Aspen, 7th ed. 2015); Gary J. Simson, Issues and Perspectives in Conflict of Laws: Cases and Materials (Carolina Academic Press, 5th ed. 2015); Stephen W. Feldman, Expanded Merchant Tort Liability, Democratic Degradation, and Mass Market Standard Form Contracts—A Two-Part Critique of Boilerplate: The Fine Print, Vanishing Rights and the Rule of Law (Part II), 63 Clev. St. L. Rev. 163 (2014).
  • Social Science Perspectives on Teaching Conflict of Laws, 27 U. Tol. L. Rev. 619 (1996), in Laura E. Little, Conflict of Laws Structure and Vision: Updating a Venerable Discipline, 31 Ga. St. U. L. Rev. 231 (2015).
  • Judicial Reputation: A Citation Analysis of Federal Courts of Appeals Judges, 27 J. Legal Stud. 271 (1998) (with William M. Landes & Lawrence Lessig), in John O. McGinnis & Russell G. Pearce, The Great Disruption: How Machine Intelligence Will Transform the Role of Lawyers in the Delivery of Legal Services, 82 Fordham L. Rev. 3041 (2014); Lee Epstein, et al., The Best for Last: The Timing of U.S. Supreme Court Decisions, 64 Duke L.J. 991 (2015); and Greta Falavigna, et al., Judicial Productivity, Delay and Efficiency: A Directional Distance Function (DDF) Approach, 240 Eur. J. Oper. Res. 592 (2015).
  • Deciding to Decide: Class Action Certification and Interlocutory Review by the United States Courts of Appeals Under Rule 23(f), 41 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 1531 (2000) (with Christine Oliver Hines), in Shay Lavie, Are Judges Tied to the Past? Evidence from Jurisdiction Cases, 43 Hofstra L. Rev. 337 (2014).
  • Supreme Court Monitoring of the United States Courts of Appeals En Banc, 9 Sup. Ct. Econ. Rev. 171 (2001) (with Tracey George), in Simona Grossi, The U.S. Supreme Court and the Modern Common Law Approach (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2015).
  • State Amici, Collective Action, and the Development of Federalism Doctrine, 46 Ga. L. Rev. 355 (2012), in Greg Goelzhauser & Nicole Vouvalis, Amicus Coalition Heterogeneity and Signaling Credibility in Supreme Court Agenda Setting, 45 Publius: J. Federalism 99 (2015).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *