Professor Solimine’s article, Federalism, Federal Courts, and Victims’ Rights, 64 Cath. U. L. Rev. 909 (2015) was published. His co-author is Kathryn Elvey, a Ph.D. candidate in criminal Justice in the UC College of Education, Criminal Justice, and Human Services.

Several of his books and articles were cited.

• Voting Rights and Election Law (LexisNexis 2010)(with Michael Dimino & Bradley Smith), in Eugene D. Mazo, The Voting Rights Act at 50 and the Section on Election Law at Birth: A Perspective, 14 Election L.J. 282 (2015).

• Judicial Reputation: A Citation Analysis of Federal Courts of Appeals Judges, 27 J. Legal Stud. 271 (1998) (with William M. Landes & Lawrence Lessig), in Michael P. Kenstowicz, Comment, The Imposition of Discretionary Supervised Release Conditions: Nudging Judges to Follow the Law, 82 U. Chi. L. Rev. 1411 (2015).

• State Court Regulation of Offers of Judgment and Its Lessons for Federal Practice, 13 Ohio St. J. Dispute Res. 51 (1997) (with Bryan Pacheco), in Doe v. Rutherford County, 86 F. Supp. 3d 831 (M.D. Tenn. 2015).

• Deciding to Decide: Class Action Certification and Interlocutory Review by the United States Courts of Appeals Under Rule 23(f), 41 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 1531 (2000) (with Christine Oliver Hines), in Jason Kornmehl, State Action on Appeal: Parker Immunity and the Collateral Order Doctrine in Antitrust Litigation, 39 Seattle U. L. Rev. 1 (2015) and in David F. Herr, Roger S. Haydock and Jeffrey W. Stempel, § 12.02 Motions to Certify and Manage Class Actions, Motion Prac. § 12.02 (2015).

• Congress, Separation of Powers, and Standing, 59 Case W. Res. L. Rev. 1023 (2009), in Mark Seidenfeld & Allie Akre, Standing in the Wake of Statutes, 57 Ariz. L. Rev. 745 (2015).

• State Amici, Collective Action, and the Development of Federalism Doctrine, 46 Ga. L. Rev. 355 (2012), in Margaret H. Lemos & Kevin M. Quinn, Litigating State Interests: Attorneys General as Amici, 90 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 1229 (2015).

• Congress, Ex parte Young, and the Fate of the Three-Judge District Court, 70 U. Pitt. L. Rev. 101 (2008); The Fall and Rise of Specialized Federal Constitutional Courts, 17 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 115 (2014); and The Three-Judge District Court in Voting Rights Litigation, 30 U. Mich. J. L. Ref. 79 (1996), in Joshua A. Yost, Comment, “If It Ain’t Broke, Don’t Fix It”: Evaluating North Carolina’s Creation of a Three-Judge District Court to Hear Constitutional Challenges to State Law, 93 N.C. L. Rev. 1893 (2015).

• Institutional Process, Agenda Setting, and the Development of Election Law on the Supreme Court, 68 Ohio St. L.J. 767, 783 (2007), in Joshua A. Yost, “If it Ain’t Broke, Don’t Fix it”: Evaluating North Carolina’s Creation of a Three-Judge Court to Hear Constitutional Challenges to State Law, 93 N.C. L. Rev. 1893 (September, 2015).