• Professor Bradford Mank’s Prudential Standing Doctrine Abolished or Waiting for a Comeback?: Lexmark International, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc., was published at 18 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 213 (2015).
• Professor Mank was quoted in Rebecca Wilhelm’s Bloomberg article, Courts: Standing Case Could Affect Environmental Plaintiffs.
• Professor Mank provided commentary at the October 28, 2015, lunch-time Federalist Society event on the subject of the Constitution’s provision for birthright citizenship.

Additionally, Professor Mank’s work was cited in the following:

• Professor Mank’s After Gonzales v. Raich: Is the Endangered Species Act Constitutional Under the Commerce Clause?, 78 U. Colo. L. Rev. 375, 428 (2007), in Damien M. Schiff, The Endangered Species Act and the Commerce Clause: A Tangential Relationship, 2015 NO. 6 RMMLF-INST Paper NO. 10B (November 4-5, 2015).
• Professor Mank’s Protecting Intrastate Threatened Species: Does the Endangered Species Act Encroach on Traditional State Authority and Exceed the Outer Limits of the Commerce Clause?, 36 Ga. L. Rev. 723, 793-95 (2002), in Jonathan Wood, A Federal Crime Against Nature? The Federal Government Cannot Prohibit Harm to All Endangered Species Under the Necessary and Proper Clause, 29 Tul. Envtl. L.J. 65 (2015).
• Professor Mank’s Can Congress Regulate Intrastate Endangered Species Under the Commerce Clause? The Split in the Circuits over Whether the Regulated Activity Is Private Commercial Development or the Taking of Protected Species, 69 Brook. L. Rev. 923, 991-92 (2004), in Jonathan Wood, A Federal Crime Against Nature? The Federal Government Cannot Prohibit Harm to All Endangered Species Under the Necessary and Proper Clause, 29 Tul. Envtl. L.J. 65 (2015).
• Professor Mank’s Standing and Statistical Persons: A Risk-Based Approach to Standing, 36 Ecology L.Q. 665, 737-41 (2009), in Existence-Value Standing, 129 Harv. L. Rev. 775 (2016).
• Professor Mank’s Textualism’s Selective Canons of Statutory Construction: Reinvigorating Individual Liberties, Legislative Authority, and Deference to Executive Agencies, 86 Ky. L.J. 527, 603-08 (1998), in Alexandra N. Mogul, Behind Enemy Phone Lines: Insider Trading, Parallel Enforcement, and Sharing the Fruits of Wiretaps (2015).
• Professor Mank’s Is There a Private Cause of Action Under EPA’s Title VI Regulations?: The Need to Empower Environmental Justice Plaintiffs, 24 Colum. J. Envtl. L. 1, 37-53 (1999), in John Copeland Nagle, Pope Francis, Environmental Anthropologist, 28 Regent U. L. Rev. 7 (2015-2016).
• Professor Mank’s Does United States v. Windsor (the DOMA Case) Open the Door to Congressional Standing Rights?, 76 U. Pitt. L. Rev. 1, 60-62 (2014), in Jonathan Remy Nash, A Functional Theory of Congressional Standing, 114 Mich. L. Rev. 339 (2015).