Michael E. Solimine / Feb. & Mar. 2014

Michael’s article, The Fall and Rise of Specialized Federal Constitutional Courts, will be published in the University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law.

Several of Michael’s articles were cited.

  •  Shoring Up Article III: Legislative Court Doctrine in the Post-CFTC v. Schor Era, 68 B.U. L. Rev. 85 (1988) (with Richard B. Saphire), in Brook Gotberg, Preferences are Public Rights, 2013 Wis. L. Rev. 1355;
  • Judicial Reputation: A Citation Analysis of Federal Courts of Appeals Judges, 27 J. Legal Stud. 271 (1998) (with William M. Landes & Lawrence Lessig), in John R. Lott, ABA Ratings: What Do They Really Measure?, 156 Pub. Choice 139 (2013);
  • Ideology and En Banc Review, 67 N.C. L. Rev. 29 (1988), in Alexandra Sadinsky, Note, Redefining En Banc Review in the Federal Courts of Appeals, 82 Fordham L. Rev. 2001 (2014);
  • Congress, Ex parte Young, and the Fate of the Three-Judge District Court, 70 U. Pitt. L. Rev. 101 (2008), in Samuel L. Bray, The Myth of the Mild Declaratory Judgment, 63 Duke L.J. 1091 (2014);
  • Revitalizing Interlocutory Review in the Federal Courts, 58 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1165 (1990), in Tory Weigand, Discretionary Interlocutory Appeals Under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b): A First Circuit Survey, 19 Roger Williams L. Rev. 183 (2014), and Robin J. Efforn, Reason Giving and Rule Making in Procedural Law, 65 Ala. L. Rev. 683 (2014);
  • An Economic and Empirical Analysis of Choice of Law, 24 Ga. L. Rev. 49 (1989), in David L. Noll, The New Conflicts Law, 2 Stan. J. Complex Litig. 41 (2014), and Thomas O. Main, The Word Commons and Foreign Law, 46 Cornell Int’l L.J. 219 (2013);
  • Supreme Court Monitoring of State Supreme Courts in the Twenty-First Century, 35 Ind. L. Rev. 335 (2002), in Joshua A. Douglas, The Rights to Vote Under State Constitutions, 67 Vand. L. Rev. 89 (2014);
  • The Solicitor General Unbound: Amicus Curiae Activism and Deference in the Supreme Court, 45 Ariz. St. L.J. 1183 (2013), in Aaron-Andrew P. Bruhl, Hierarchially Variable Deference to Agency Interpretations, 89 Notre Dame L. Rev. 727 (2013);
  • Deciding to Decide: Class Action Certification and Interlocutory Review by the United States Courts of Appeals Under Rule 23(f), 41 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 1531 (2000)(with Christine Hines), in Robert H. Klonoff, The Decline of Class Actions, 90 Wash. U. L. Rev. 729 (2013), and Earl M. Maltz, The Ghost of Winberry: Separation of Powers and Tort Reform Proposals, 44 Rutgers L.J. 39 (2013); and
  • The Supreme Court and the DIG: An Empirical and Institutional Analysis, 2005 Wis. L. Rev. 1421 (with Rafael Gely), and The Supreme Court and the Sophisticated Use of DIGs, 18 Sup. Ct. Econ. Rev. 155 (2010)(with Rafael Gely) in David M. O’Brien, Storm Center: The Supreme Court in American Politics (W.W. Norton & Co., 10th ed. 2014).

Comments are closed.